<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cloud Hosting Mag &#187; Comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cloudhostingmag.com/tag/comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cloudhostingmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 02:25:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Content Delivery Networks ( CDN ) Pricing Comparison</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudhostingmag.com/2010/03/content-delivery-networks-cdn-pricing-comparison/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cloudhostingmag.com/2010/03/content-delivery-networks-cdn-pricing-comparison/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 04:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudhostingmag.com/?p=131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Contend Delivery Networks (CDN s) pricing is typically broken into bandwidth tiers plus a  charge separate storage charge. To simplify comparison I have used the base bandwidth and storage of each plan for the CDN&#8217;s which publish pricing, others such &#8230; <a href="http://www.cloudhostingmag.com/2010/03/content-delivery-networks-cdn-pricing-comparison/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contend Delivery Networks (CDN s) pricing is typically broken into bandwidth tiers plus a  charge separate storage charge. To simplify comparison I have used the base bandwidth and storage of each plan for the CDN&#8217;s which publish pricing, others such as Level3, Akamai, Edgecast etc usually have a high minimum charge and are not suitable for smaller content publishers.<br />
For comparison purposes the base plan for each CDN has been chosen which for all providers offers at least 5TB of bandwidth out. Other charges such as transactions and bandwidth have been ignored for this comparison as these usually do not have a significant impact on the final cost.</p>
<h3>CDN Pricing (March 2010)</h3>
<div style="font-size: small;">
<table>
<tbody>
<tr height="20">
<td class="style2" height="20"></td>
<td class="style3" style="text-align: center;"><strong>Storage<br />
<em>(per GB)</em></strong></td>
<td class="style4" style="text-align: center;"><strong>Bandwidth Out<br />
<em>(per GB)</em></strong></td>
<td class="style5" style="text-align: center;"><strong>Bandwidth Out &gt; 50TB<br />
<em>(per GB) </em></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr height="20">
<td class="style2" style="text-align: right;" height="20"><strong>Amazon CloudFront</strong></td>
<td class="style3" style="text-align: center;">0.15</td>
<td class="style4" style="text-align: center;">0.15</td>
<td class="style5" style="text-align: center;">0.10</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20">
<td class="style2" style="text-align: right;" height="20"><strong>Rackspace CloudFiles</strong></td>
<td class="style3" style="text-align: center;">0.15</td>
<td class="style4" style="text-align: center;">0.22</td>
<td class="style5" style="text-align: center;">0.22</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20">
<td class="style2" style="text-align: right;" height="20"><strong>MaxCDN</strong></td>
<td class="style3" style="text-align: center;">0.995</td>
<td class="style4" style="text-align: center;">0.10</td>
<td class="style5" style="text-align: center;">0.075</td>
</tr>
<tr height="20">
<td class="style2" style="text-align: right;" height="20"><strong>SimpleCDN</strong></td>
<td class="style3" style="text-align: center;">*</td>
<td class="style4" style="text-align: center;">0.03</td>
<td class="style5" style="text-align: center;">0.02</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>*SimpleCDN does not have a separate storage charge, pricing is in plans for a set amount of storage and bandwidth and overages are not allowed (you are required to upgrade to the next plan). The base plan used for this pricing comparison has 2GB of storage and  5TB of bandwidth per month.</p>
<p></em></p>
<h3>Observations:</h3>
<div style="font-size: small;">
<ul>
<li>RackSpace CloudFiles is by far the most expensive CDN, especially in a high bandwidth environment (although the storage is cheaper than MaxCDN) . Its integration with RackSpace Cloud Servers and Cloud Sites mean it will still be a decent choice for RackSpace users who don&#8217;t have high bandwidth requirements.</li>
<li>SimpleCDN is by far the cheapest CDN although the plan structure will make it much more expensive. You are required to select a set plan which a fixed monthly cost (eg $150 for 5TB bandwidth and 2GB storage), so if you only use 1TB of bandwidth this would work out at around  $0.15 per GB. Similarly storage is a fixed amount and you are required to upgrade to a more expensive plan if your storage exceeds the plan amount. This is inflexible and means the actual cost per GB of storage and bandwidth will be much higher than the published amounts.</li>
<li>Amazon&#8217;s storage (ie Amazon Simple Storage Solution &#8211; S3) works out much cheaper than other providers for very large storage amounts (eg &gt;500TB of storage is priced at $0.105 per GB). It should be noted that CloudFront  is not as tightly integrated into its S3 storage  as the other providers. The CloudFront CDN is essentially a blot-on service to the S3 storage service. This makes CloudFront a bit more complicated to use although there are several third-party integration tools.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p><!--</p>
<p>.style2<br />
{<br />
width: 165px;<br />
}<br />
.style3<br />
{<br />
width: 135px;<br />
}<br />
.style4<br />
{<br />
width: 135px;<br />
}<br />
.style5<br />
{<br />
width: 135px;<br />
}<br />
--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cloudhostingmag.com/2010/03/content-delivery-networks-cdn-pricing-comparison/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cloud Hosting vs Dedicated Hosting</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudhostingmag.com/2010/03/cloud-hosting-vs-dedicated-hosting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cloudhostingmag.com/2010/03/cloud-hosting-vs-dedicated-hosting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comparison]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudhostingmag.com/?p=100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The choice between cloud hosting or dedicated hosting often comes down to your requirements for your host, we break this down into the key areas for any hosting solution: Scale - This is probably the biggest single advantage of cloud &#8230; <a href="http://www.cloudhostingmag.com/2010/03/cloud-hosting-vs-dedicated-hosting/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The choice between cloud hosting or dedicated hosting often comes down to your requirements for your host, we break this down into the key areas for any hosting solution:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Scale </strong>- This is probably the biggest single advantage of cloud hosting, scaling up beyond a single server is notoriously difficult on a dedicated server setup &#8211; load balancing, maintaining sessions across different machines and a host of other issues make scaling up very tricky.<br />
Cloud hosting by comparison allows painless scaling by spinning up more instances as required, instances can be programatically spun up and destroyed as required meaning the application can handle all the scaling without need for intervention. In addition to writing custom code, third-party products such as <a href="http://www.rightscale.com" target="_blank">RightScale</a> can sit on top of a cloud hosting instance and automatically implement all the scaling.</li>
<li><strong>Cost </strong>- Dedicated hosting still has a pricing advantage for small installations. A single low-spec (2GB RAM, 160 GB Storage, 2Ghz single-core CPU) dedicated server will cost about $130 per month for dedicated hosting, but this usually comes with a huge amount of bandwidth (2TB per month on Server Beach for example).  By contrast, cloud hosts charge a little less for the &#8216;hardware&#8217; &#8211; a similar spec&#8217;d server at RackSpace Cloud Servers costs about $90 per month, however bandwidth is usually charged between $0.11 &#8211; $0.14 per GB , so if your users will require a lot of bandwidth cloud hosting can work out more expensive (although it should be noted, if you are using a lot of bandwidth you should be using a CDN)</li>
<li><strong>Requirement for OS/Hardware Access</strong> &#8211; A major drawback of cloud hosting is the lack of access to the operating system and/or hardware. If you need to fine-tune the software/hardware stack then dedicated hosting is the only way to go.</li>
<li><strong>Security </strong>- Theoretically a cloud server should be less secure than a dedicated host, if your &#8216;instance&#8217; is part of a cluster of machines that will inherently be less secure than an isolated machine which has fewer connections. However, against this must be weighed the fact that cloud hosts will (or should!) have a dedicated security team to patch the OS when necessary and implement security best practices which will often not be fully adhered to if you have to manage the security of a dedicated host yourself.<br />
In practice, the greatest vulnerabilities are usually at the application level which is independent of the platform.</li>
<li><strong>Simplicity </strong>- Cloud servers are far simpler to administrate than dedicated servers, adding servers can be done via a control panel and all the OS patching is fully managed.</li>
<li><strong>Reliability</strong> &#8211; There is no definitive winner here, cloud servers have built in failover so you will not notice a hardware/server failure. However it should be remembered that a cloud host is actually in  a cluster of servers which you share with other users, severe slowdowns can occur from the other users running long running queries on the cluster.</li>
</ul>
<p>So cloud hosting stacks up very well against dedicated hosts and if you run a simple application such as a CMS powered website then a cloud host is almost certainly the right choice, however if you need a very specialized solution then dedicated hosting (or co-lo) can still be the best choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cloudhostingmag.com/2010/03/cloud-hosting-vs-dedicated-hosting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

